Any business can find it challenging to manage all of the content requirements for a multichannel world. Having the right content management system (CMS), such as a component content management system, can help organizations publish content to multiple locations, improve collaboration, and create a single source of truth for all content assets. Not every CMS on the market has the capabilities to work as a CCMS, and this article highlights key differences between content solutions that support a component‑based versus page‑based approach.
#What is a Component Content Management System (CCMS)?
A Component Content Management System (CCMS) is a CMS that enables teams to build modular, reusable content models that can be used to quickly assemble new pages or content types. Unlike full‑page templates, a component CMS lets you break content into granular blocks of structure that are reused throughout the site. A component might be a header banner, a call‑to‑action (CTA) button, an image carousel, product details, a table or even a simple paragraph.
Some use cases where a component CMS is particularly effective include user guides, technical documentation, training materials and knowledge bases. By structuring information into bite‑sized modules, teams can develop new experiences without rebuilding common elements from scratch.
#CCMS vs page builder CMS
A component CMS takes a highly structured approach to organizing content data, making it possible to break up pages into modular components. Instead of building new content models for each page type, teams build bite‑sized blocks that can be combined to form any number of content pages. This modular content structure helps teams future‑proof their content strategies. As needs change over time, editors can quickly build new and unique pages by repurposing existing components. When the same components are reused across the site, global updates become trivial because a change in one place cascades everywhere that component is used.
By contrast, a page builder CMS structures content as a full document. This entire‑document approach often makes it easy to set up and get started with simple marketing sites. However, it lacks the structure to reuse and repurpose site elements. Every page type needs its own template, and updates must be made to each page individually. As teams scale up content production, this can lead to data duplication and copy‑and‑pasting that makes it hard to keep content consistent across the site.
Page Builder CMS | Component CMS |
---|---|
Content is structured as full pages | Content is structured as modular blocks |
New pages types require a brand new template | New page types are created by rearranging existing components |
Updates made to individual pages | Update once, update everywhere |
#Component vs. document approaches
A CCMS uses a component‑based approach to content modeling, where teams consider content a collection of modular elements. A page builder CMS uses an entire‑document approach, where content is thought of in terms of full pages.
With an entire‑document approach, for example, the product page would be a single model and the content entered is tied to a particular page and becomes single‑use. By adopting a component‑based approach, the same product page is assembled from CTAs, product attributes, unique selling points (USPs) or use cases and the content is structured so that it can be used in different ways throughout the site, such as in personalized recommendations or marketing landing pages.
Component‑based content management helps teams work more efficiently, create reusable content, deliver content to multiple frontends and ensure information remains consistent across the entire project. While it may take time to adjust to a more modular approach, it ultimately gives content teams more independence and empowers them to be more creative with how information is conveyed.
Editor's Note
#What does a CCMS enable?
Content reuse
With a modular approach to content, teams can populate pages with information that should remain consistent across the site while having a single entry to update. If a team wants to test a new CTA version across the site, for example, they don’t have to remember where the CTA is used. They can update it in a single place and reflect those changes sitewide. This significantly improves the content team’s workflow and helps build better brand consistency.
Content enrichment
As more elements of the site become reusable, teams have more time to enrich new pages with existing content and, in general, spend more time creating quality content. When creating new content, teams can pull from existing elements rather than starting from scratch, which allows them to focus on the new and more engaging parts. This helps teams balance creating high‑quality content and avoiding single‑use content that is hard to scale. Components also make building personalization into the customer experience easier, as adapting specific components can create a memorable experience without creating cumbersome workflows.
Easy localization and internationalization
Making it easier to keep content consistent across the site also makes the translation and localization process shorter and more concise. Instead of updating similar content repeatedly, teams can ensure that the content gets localized quickly and efficiently. With a modular approach, teams can prioritize the most important components to localize first, with more granular control over what components can be global and which should change for different locales.
Omnichannel publishing
Traditional page builder CMSs model content with desktop in mind, which doesn’t reflect today’s omnichannel consumers. A component CMS must give content data a structure in order to break it down into modular components. This structured approach also makes it easier to adapt content to different displays. If teams want a component to look different on a mobile site compared to a desktop site, that can be done in the frontend design without changing the underlying data structure, allowing the same content data to be reused on different channels with different displays. Using the same components across devices and channels helps ensure the messaging remains consistent while reducing manual work.
Centralized control
With highly structured content data, it’s easier to combine content data from different business systems and create a single source of truth. Rather than storing duplicate content in multiple locations, content teams know that they have all of the relevant information in one space without having to copy‑and‑paste between multiple systems or from existing content pages. Content teams can quickly build new pages with the flexible component models and easily enrich these pages with data from multiple systems. This allows teams to launch new content more efficiently, make updates more easily and keep content consistent throughout the site.
#Who can benefit from a CCMS?
A component CMS provides numerous benefits for organizations that have outgrown the capabilities of a traditional CMS.
Organizations with a complex internal knowledge base
Organizations with complex knowledge bases—like internal or external web portals—can easily find themselves in a situation where content data is housed in multiple systems that are not easily accessible to the broader team. With a CCMS, teams can have a single place to access all their content with the flexibility to use that data in a wide range of use cases.
Case study
Organizations with multiple frontends
Teams working with multiple frontends that wish to pull from a single source of truth can greatly benefit from a component‑based approach to content management. Teams can pull just the data they need for the particular frontend, which may vary wildly. Keeping all of the content within a component CMS helps ensure that each channel's content stays up‑to‑date and relevant.
Case study
Organizations with large amounts of structured data
Teams working with a large amount of structured data will find a component CMS to be a natural fit. Whether teams are manually managing all of the content or federating content into the CMS, they have a lot of flexibility in how they structure content data and optimize workflows.
Case study
#Advantages of a Component Content Management System
Better consistency and accuracy
Teams can build a single, data‑rich content repository where they manage content across channels. Instead of updating content in multiple systems, teams manage their content in one central place. With content broken down into modular elements, updating site elements takes seconds rather than minutes or hours. This ensures that messaging stays consistent across the site and devices.
Content reuse
A component CMS lets teams reuse structural components and content assets to build new, unique pages quickly. Teams don’t have to waste time rebuilding common elements, so they can focus more on creating new, engaging content. Reuse also makes it easier to run consistent A/B tests across your entire site.
Reduced maintenance cost
Teams no longer need to copy and paste information between multiple systems or different pages, allowing them to cut down on maintenance costs. A component CMS helps keep content well organized and easy to find, rather than becoming unusable or forgotten in a separate system.
Multichannel publishing
The highly structured way a component CMS handles content data makes it easier to adapt content to the different formats needed for different channels. Many component CMS platforms adopt a headless architecture, which means that backend data is structured independently of frontend design. The same content can therefore be displayed in different ways across different frontend channels (“heads”).
Traceability
With a component CMS, it’s easier to know where content is coming from and what must be done to update it. Using a core set of components, managed in a central location, helps teams better track the data sources, change history and channel locations of each piece of content.
Scalability
A component CMS can boost teams' productivity and allow them to expand their content strategy by making it easy to reuse elements across channels and push out global updates all at once. The granular control of a component‑based approach lets teams efficiently meet the unique needs of different channels, enabling them to quickly scale the brand experience into new markets, locales and touchpoints.
#[object Object]
Adopting a component content management system requires some planning, but the payoff is significant. Start by mapping your content models and identifying elements that can become reusable components—such as headers, product modules or FAQs. Define clear guidelines for authors on when to create a new component versus when to reuse an existing one. Invest in training so editors and developers understand how to work with structured content and how to assemble pages without relying on full‑page templates. Finally, maintain a governance process: document how components are approved, updated and deprecated. A well‑governed component library prevents duplication and keeps your site maintainable as it grows.
#How Hygraph enables component management
Hygraph is a component CMS with a headless architecture that empowers organizations to easily create, manage and deliver complex content at scale. It provides very flexible content modeling to build high‑performing, content‑driven applications with any frontend technology.
Hygraph lets both developers and content creators work autonomously and take full advantage of a component‑based approach. With an API‑first design for efficient development and a user‑friendly interface—Hygraph Studio—non‑technical users can assemble pages quickly. This easy‑to‑use system has allowed Komax to add new elements to their website at three times their previous speed and helped them raise their Site Performance score from 74 to 99. Developers can now integrate new requirements into the website quickly. Content editors have a series of components to use, including banners, buttons, quote boxes and download cards that allow them to spin up new pages without developer help.
Hygraph’s GraphQL API provides a high level of flexibility when structuring and querying content and makes it possible to federate all your remote data sources to create a single source of truth for content. This flexibility allows Stobag to manage their B2B customer portal, B2C marketing site and product information database all from the same CMS. Helping them transition from a print‑based to digital approach and take online revenue from 15 % of the total business share to 70 %.
Thousands of global digital teams—including Samsung, Telenor, Epic Games and 2U—monetize their content by powering mission‑critical applications with Hygraph. If you’d like to learn how Hygraph can accelerate your digital content strategy, we’re happy to have a chat.
Launch faster with the #1 easiest-to-implement headless CMS
Powerful APIs. Structured content, shipped faster.
Get startedBlog Author